16s rrna gene analysis Search Results


90
Pyrosequencing Inc v3–v5 region of the 16s rrna gene
V3–V5 Region Of The 16s Rrna Gene, supplied by Pyrosequencing Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/v3–v5 region of the 16s rrna gene/product/Pyrosequencing Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
v3–v5 region of the 16s rrna gene - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
RStudio 16s rrna amplicon metagenomic sequencing analyses
Difference of resistance gene targets between drug-free and conventional flocks for each farm at sampling time point one. Negative results indicate a decrease in gene target, and positive results indicate an increase in gene target in drug-free flocks. Data are presented as the mean (SEM) of 12 replicates. For the quantitative approach, each sample was run in triplicate ( n = 3). (A) Values are expressed on a ratio referenced to the total bacterial content of samples <t>(16S</t> <t>rRNA).</t> (B) Values are expressed on a weight basis (raw values). *Significant values are lower than the alpha level adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.
16s Rrna Amplicon Metagenomic Sequencing Analyses, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/16s rrna amplicon metagenomic sequencing analyses/product/RStudio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
16s rrna amplicon metagenomic sequencing analyses - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Refgen Technologies INC 16s rrna gene analysis
Difference of resistance gene targets between drug-free and conventional flocks for each farm at sampling time point one. Negative results indicate a decrease in gene target, and positive results indicate an increase in gene target in drug-free flocks. Data are presented as the mean (SEM) of 12 replicates. For the quantitative approach, each sample was run in triplicate ( n = 3). (A) Values are expressed on a ratio referenced to the total bacterial content of samples <t>(16S</t> <t>rRNA).</t> (B) Values are expressed on a weight basis (raw values). *Significant values are lower than the alpha level adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.
16s Rrna Gene Analysis, supplied by Refgen Technologies INC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/16s rrna gene analysis/product/Refgen Technologies INC
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
16s rrna gene analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Kyodo Milk Industry Co 16s rrna gene sequence analysis
Difference of resistance gene targets between drug-free and conventional flocks for each farm at sampling time point one. Negative results indicate a decrease in gene target, and positive results indicate an increase in gene target in drug-free flocks. Data are presented as the mean (SEM) of 12 replicates. For the quantitative approach, each sample was run in triplicate ( n = 3). (A) Values are expressed on a ratio referenced to the total bacterial content of samples <t>(16S</t> <t>rRNA).</t> (B) Values are expressed on a weight basis (raw values). *Significant values are lower than the alpha level adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.
16s Rrna Gene Sequence Analysis, supplied by Kyodo Milk Industry Co, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/16s rrna gene sequence analysis/product/Kyodo Milk Industry Co
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
16s rrna gene sequence analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Lundbeck 16s rrna gene amplicon sequencing and data analysis
Difference of resistance gene targets between drug-free and conventional flocks for each farm at sampling time point one. Negative results indicate a decrease in gene target, and positive results indicate an increase in gene target in drug-free flocks. Data are presented as the mean (SEM) of 12 replicates. For the quantitative approach, each sample was run in triplicate ( n = 3). (A) Values are expressed on a ratio referenced to the total bacterial content of samples <t>(16S</t> <t>rRNA).</t> (B) Values are expressed on a weight basis (raw values). *Significant values are lower than the alpha level adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.
16s Rrna Gene Amplicon Sequencing And Data Analysis, supplied by Lundbeck, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/16s rrna gene amplicon sequencing and data analysis/product/Lundbeck
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
16s rrna gene amplicon sequencing and data analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Illumina Inc 16s rrna gene amplicon analysis d illumina miseq sequencer
Analysis of the most important taxa exhibiting increased and decreased abundances in the CDI group compared with the control group.
16s Rrna Gene Amplicon Analysis D Illumina Miseq Sequencer, supplied by Illumina Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/16s rrna gene amplicon analysis d illumina miseq sequencer/product/Illumina Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
16s rrna gene amplicon analysis d illumina miseq sequencer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Illumina Inc hiseq 2000 platform-based 16s rrna gene sequence analysis
Analysis of the most important taxa exhibiting increased and decreased abundances in the CDI group compared with the control group.
Hiseq 2000 Platform Based 16s Rrna Gene Sequence Analysis, supplied by Illumina Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/hiseq 2000 platform-based 16s rrna gene sequence analysis/product/Illumina Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hiseq 2000 platform-based 16s rrna gene sequence analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Genetic Analysis AS 16s rrna gene amplification primer pair ga-map tm coverall
Analysis of the most important taxa exhibiting increased and decreased abundances in the CDI group compared with the control group.
16s Rrna Gene Amplification Primer Pair Ga Map Tm Coverall, supplied by Genetic Analysis AS, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/16s rrna gene amplification primer pair ga-map tm coverall/product/Genetic Analysis AS
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
16s rrna gene amplification primer pair ga-map tm coverall - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Illumina Inc 16s rrna gene sequence analysis illumina hi-seq platform
Analysis of the most important taxa exhibiting increased and decreased abundances in the CDI group compared with the control group.
16s Rrna Gene Sequence Analysis Illumina Hi Seq Platform, supplied by Illumina Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/16s rrna gene sequence analysis illumina hi-seq platform/product/Illumina Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
16s rrna gene sequence analysis illumina hi-seq platform - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Canterbury Health Laboratories 16s rrna gene sequence analysis
Analysis of the most important taxa exhibiting increased and decreased abundances in the CDI group compared with the control group.
16s Rrna Gene Sequence Analysis, supplied by Canterbury Health Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/16s rrna gene sequence analysis/product/Canterbury Health Laboratories
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
16s rrna gene sequence analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Pyrosequencing Inc pyrosequencing-based analysis of partial 16s rrna gene sequences specific for enterics
Analysis of the most important taxa exhibiting increased and decreased abundances in the CDI group compared with the control group.
Pyrosequencing Based Analysis Of Partial 16s Rrna Gene Sequences Specific For Enterics, supplied by Pyrosequencing Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pyrosequencing-based analysis of partial 16s rrna gene sequences specific for enterics/product/Pyrosequencing Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pyrosequencing-based analysis of partial 16s rrna gene sequences specific for enterics - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
AKESOgen Inc 16s rrna gene analysis of variable region 3 (v3) and variable region 4 (v4)
Analysis of the most important taxa exhibiting increased and decreased abundances in the CDI group compared with the control group.
16s Rrna Gene Analysis Of Variable Region 3 (V3) And Variable Region 4 (V4), supplied by AKESOgen Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/16s rrna gene analysis of variable region 3 (v3) and variable region 4 (v4)/product/AKESOgen Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
16s rrna gene analysis of variable region 3 (v3) and variable region 4 (v4) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Difference of resistance gene targets between drug-free and conventional flocks for each farm at sampling time point one. Negative results indicate a decrease in gene target, and positive results indicate an increase in gene target in drug-free flocks. Data are presented as the mean (SEM) of 12 replicates. For the quantitative approach, each sample was run in triplicate ( n = 3). (A) Values are expressed on a ratio referenced to the total bacterial content of samples (16S rRNA). (B) Values are expressed on a weight basis (raw values). *Significant values are lower than the alpha level adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.

Journal: Frontiers in Veterinary Science

Article Title: Impacts of Short-Term Antibiotic Withdrawal and Long-Term Judicious Antibiotic Use on Resistance Gene Abundance and Cecal Microbiota Composition on Commercial Broiler Chicken Farms in Québec

doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.547181

Figure Lengend Snippet: Difference of resistance gene targets between drug-free and conventional flocks for each farm at sampling time point one. Negative results indicate a decrease in gene target, and positive results indicate an increase in gene target in drug-free flocks. Data are presented as the mean (SEM) of 12 replicates. For the quantitative approach, each sample was run in triplicate ( n = 3). (A) Values are expressed on a ratio referenced to the total bacterial content of samples (16S rRNA). (B) Values are expressed on a weight basis (raw values). *Significant values are lower than the alpha level adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.

Article Snippet: For the 16S rRNA amplicon metagenomic sequencing analyses, the alpha and the beta diversity indices were calculated using Rstudio.

Techniques: Sampling

Difference of resistance gene targets between flocks sampled from conventional barns at sampling time point one and the flock from the same barn at sampling time point two. At sampling time point one, conventional barns from farms C to F remained on a conventional rearing program after the 15-months study period, whereas barns from farms A and B moved to a program for judiciously using antibiotics. Negative results indicate a decrease in gene target, and positive results indicate an increase in gene target in the sampled flock at sampling time point two. Data are presented as the mean (SEM) of 12 replicates. For the quantitative approach, each sample was run in triplicate ( n = 3). (A) Values are expressed on a ratio referenced to the total bacterial content of samples (16S rRNA). (B) Values are expressed on a weight basis (raw values). *Significant values are lower than the alpha level adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.

Journal: Frontiers in Veterinary Science

Article Title: Impacts of Short-Term Antibiotic Withdrawal and Long-Term Judicious Antibiotic Use on Resistance Gene Abundance and Cecal Microbiota Composition on Commercial Broiler Chicken Farms in Québec

doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.547181

Figure Lengend Snippet: Difference of resistance gene targets between flocks sampled from conventional barns at sampling time point one and the flock from the same barn at sampling time point two. At sampling time point one, conventional barns from farms C to F remained on a conventional rearing program after the 15-months study period, whereas barns from farms A and B moved to a program for judiciously using antibiotics. Negative results indicate a decrease in gene target, and positive results indicate an increase in gene target in the sampled flock at sampling time point two. Data are presented as the mean (SEM) of 12 replicates. For the quantitative approach, each sample was run in triplicate ( n = 3). (A) Values are expressed on a ratio referenced to the total bacterial content of samples (16S rRNA). (B) Values are expressed on a weight basis (raw values). *Significant values are lower than the alpha level adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.

Article Snippet: For the 16S rRNA amplicon metagenomic sequencing analyses, the alpha and the beta diversity indices were calculated using Rstudio.

Techniques: Sampling

Difference of resistance gene targets between flocks sampled from drug-free barns at sampling time point one and the flock sampled from the same barn at sampling time point two. Drug-free barns from farms C to F went back to a conventional rearing protocol after the 15-months study period, whereas drug-free barns from farms A and B moved to a program for judiciously using antibiotics. Negative results indicate a decrease in gene target, and positive results indicate an increase in gene target in the sampled flock at sampling time point two. Data are presented as the mean (SEM) of 12 replicates. For the quantitative approach, each sample was run in triplicate ( n = 3). (A) Values are expressed on a ratio referenced to total bacterial content of samples (16S rRNA). (B) Values are expressed on a weight basis (raw values). *Significant values are lower than the alpha level adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.

Journal: Frontiers in Veterinary Science

Article Title: Impacts of Short-Term Antibiotic Withdrawal and Long-Term Judicious Antibiotic Use on Resistance Gene Abundance and Cecal Microbiota Composition on Commercial Broiler Chicken Farms in Québec

doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.547181

Figure Lengend Snippet: Difference of resistance gene targets between flocks sampled from drug-free barns at sampling time point one and the flock sampled from the same barn at sampling time point two. Drug-free barns from farms C to F went back to a conventional rearing protocol after the 15-months study period, whereas drug-free barns from farms A and B moved to a program for judiciously using antibiotics. Negative results indicate a decrease in gene target, and positive results indicate an increase in gene target in the sampled flock at sampling time point two. Data are presented as the mean (SEM) of 12 replicates. For the quantitative approach, each sample was run in triplicate ( n = 3). (A) Values are expressed on a ratio referenced to total bacterial content of samples (16S rRNA). (B) Values are expressed on a weight basis (raw values). *Significant values are lower than the alpha level adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.

Article Snippet: For the 16S rRNA amplicon metagenomic sequencing analyses, the alpha and the beta diversity indices were calculated using Rstudio.

Techniques: Sampling

Difference of resistance gene targets at sampling time point two between flocks of the same participating farm that adopted either a conventional rearing program or a program for judiciously using antibiotics after the completion of the 15-months study period, considering the barn that was on a drug-free program during the 15-months study period as the comparison reference unit. Negative results indicate a decrease in gene target, and positive results indicate an increase in gene target in the flock sampled at sampling time point two used as a reference unit. Data are presented as the mean (SEM) of 12 replicates. For the quantitative approach, each sample was run in triplicate ( n = 3). (A) Values are expressed on a ratio referenced to total bacterial content of samples (16S rRNA). (B) Values are expressed on a weight basis (raw values). *Significant values are lower than the alpha level adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.

Journal: Frontiers in Veterinary Science

Article Title: Impacts of Short-Term Antibiotic Withdrawal and Long-Term Judicious Antibiotic Use on Resistance Gene Abundance and Cecal Microbiota Composition on Commercial Broiler Chicken Farms in Québec

doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.547181

Figure Lengend Snippet: Difference of resistance gene targets at sampling time point two between flocks of the same participating farm that adopted either a conventional rearing program or a program for judiciously using antibiotics after the completion of the 15-months study period, considering the barn that was on a drug-free program during the 15-months study period as the comparison reference unit. Negative results indicate a decrease in gene target, and positive results indicate an increase in gene target in the flock sampled at sampling time point two used as a reference unit. Data are presented as the mean (SEM) of 12 replicates. For the quantitative approach, each sample was run in triplicate ( n = 3). (A) Values are expressed on a ratio referenced to total bacterial content of samples (16S rRNA). (B) Values are expressed on a weight basis (raw values). *Significant values are lower than the alpha level adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.

Article Snippet: For the 16S rRNA amplicon metagenomic sequencing analyses, the alpha and the beta diversity indices were calculated using Rstudio.

Techniques: Sampling, Comparison

Analysis of the most important taxa exhibiting increased and decreased abundances in the CDI group compared with the control group.

Journal: Pathogens

Article Title: Gut Microbiota Composition Associated with Clostridioides difficile Colonization and Infection

doi: 10.3390/pathogens11070781

Figure Lengend Snippet: Analysis of the most important taxa exhibiting increased and decreased abundances in the CDI group compared with the control group.

Article Snippet: 16S rRNA gene amplicon analysis d Illumina MiSeq sequencer , [ ] , CDI group ( n = 88; 52.7 y) G1 (ATB responder) G2 (non-ATB responder) G3 (recurrent CDI) G4 (non-recurrent CDI) No control group (other studies) , Decreased alpha diversity (Chao1 index) in the CDI group than in the control group. , G1 Ruminococcaceae; Rikenellaceae; Clostridiaceae; Bacteroides; Faecalibacterium; Rothia G2 Clostridiaceae , Lachnospiraceae , Blautia , Coprococcus , Streptococcus , Bifidobacterium , Ruminococcus and Actinomyces. G3 with recurrent CDI Veillonella , Enterobacteriaceae , Streptococci , Parabacteroides , and Lachnospiraceae , /.

Techniques: Control, Amplification, Bacteria, Sequencing